Originally posted by Big T
Hey RF,
you haven't seen our sponsors, one guy is a indian trillionaire (in rupees of course) .......even Abramovich is trying to get in the action....but we had to turn him away.
Originally posted by knvb
Arroyo, not really my point. The Ref said (loud enough for me to hear anyway) that it was studs up. Whether you thought it was a foul or not he did and gave it... Plus it was inside the 18 on the attack. That out of the way, back to my question... Why the indirect free kick as apposed to the PK?
Originally posted by Yoda
Now if you guys could only play soccer you'd be set1 !
Originally posted by Knight Rhider
Feels good to finally draw some victory blood, although it was not the purrrtiest game we did take it to them. SUFC are actually pretty good, individually they had a load of skill. They just need to play as more of a team. They are probably the only team in the league that is younger than us...didn't know that existed.
Originally posted by Kokanee
Were you actually at the game last night, do you actually play in the league??? Not taking anything away from SUFC, but they are not the youngest team in the league. Their back line looks like Aves identical twins, with a tan of course .
Originally posted by Knight Rhider
Feels good to finally draw some victory blood, although it was not the purrrtiest game we did take it to them. SUFC are actually pretty good, individually they had a load of skill.
Originally posted by burkee&nonis
Another frustrating game for us. Lots of individual talent won't get us anywhere. .
Originally posted by Dude
Yes, you read it here first. Slane actually passed the ball when he had a sure sitter
Originally posted by Osame bin madden
Hmmm sufc lost to you guys but they " are actually pretty good"
could be