Wagon,
Granted we were a crap team, I am not saying that we were not. The MWSL had full knowledge of where I would be getting my players from when they granted me a Premier spot (our U-21 team of the previous year and some of the Div. 2 players in our club with a few Div. 1's that I managed to pull over) yet every game they came out to watch they continually reminded me that we were at best an average div 1 team and should be playing there. So why the fcuk did they grant me a Premier spot (and relent about it soooooooooooooo much that now they have done the same thing with this new Richmond team!!!!!!!!).
All I am really souting about is the lack of consistency from year to year. When you are the worst team in your division the is no guarentee that you will be relegated (Surrey United's div 1 team for instance) and when you are the best team in your division there is no guarentee that you will be promoted.
The league needs to realise that there are two sides to the womens game, the competitive and the recreational. At the moment they treat everyone as a recreational team placing them in the division that they (the league) thinks best suits them. That is fine for those teams who just want to play at a comparable level but it is an insult to those teams with a disire to play for something (i.e. promotion/relegation). All the league need do is ask which teams want to play competitively and which want to play recreationally. Those recreational teams can play in a rec league where you stay at div 3 or div 2 forever (but if you get too good and start beating everyone you play in the rec league a level above you - they can switch the team groupings mid-way during the season like they do with the U12's so that no team is too good or too bad, there will of course always be an exception).
The competitive teams could then be split into 2 or 3 divisions of 8 to 10 teams depending on numbers and adhere to clearly defined rules for promotion and relegation. The competitive teams would all sign on A forms with the rec teams on B forms. The competitive teams could then play in an imperial type cup with the better premier teams not playing until later rounds (like the FA does).
IMHO this would provide a better class of soccer to the lower divisions, as teams are fighting to get promoted or to avoid relegation, which would by default create a better class of soccer in the higher divisions.
The one bit of advice that I heard from several Premier coaches during my season at the top was not to worry about the losses as the league did not count for anything. Everyone was entered in the league cup at the end and it was rare that teams were ever relegated so I was sure to be around next year. When your games don't count for anything competitive teams play with a recreational manner and the caliber suffers.
I could go on longer but my tea is ready.
Cheerio
Granted we were a crap team, I am not saying that we were not. The MWSL had full knowledge of where I would be getting my players from when they granted me a Premier spot (our U-21 team of the previous year and some of the Div. 2 players in our club with a few Div. 1's that I managed to pull over) yet every game they came out to watch they continually reminded me that we were at best an average div 1 team and should be playing there. So why the fcuk did they grant me a Premier spot (and relent about it soooooooooooooo much that now they have done the same thing with this new Richmond team!!!!!!!!).
All I am really souting about is the lack of consistency from year to year. When you are the worst team in your division the is no guarentee that you will be relegated (Surrey United's div 1 team for instance) and when you are the best team in your division there is no guarentee that you will be promoted.
The league needs to realise that there are two sides to the womens game, the competitive and the recreational. At the moment they treat everyone as a recreational team placing them in the division that they (the league) thinks best suits them. That is fine for those teams who just want to play at a comparable level but it is an insult to those teams with a disire to play for something (i.e. promotion/relegation). All the league need do is ask which teams want to play competitively and which want to play recreationally. Those recreational teams can play in a rec league where you stay at div 3 or div 2 forever (but if you get too good and start beating everyone you play in the rec league a level above you - they can switch the team groupings mid-way during the season like they do with the U12's so that no team is too good or too bad, there will of course always be an exception).
The competitive teams could then be split into 2 or 3 divisions of 8 to 10 teams depending on numbers and adhere to clearly defined rules for promotion and relegation. The competitive teams would all sign on A forms with the rec teams on B forms. The competitive teams could then play in an imperial type cup with the better premier teams not playing until later rounds (like the FA does).
IMHO this would provide a better class of soccer to the lower divisions, as teams are fighting to get promoted or to avoid relegation, which would by default create a better class of soccer in the higher divisions.
The one bit of advice that I heard from several Premier coaches during my season at the top was not to worry about the losses as the league did not count for anything. Everyone was entered in the league cup at the end and it was rare that teams were ever relegated so I was sure to be around next year. When your games don't count for anything competitive teams play with a recreational manner and the caliber suffers.
I could go on longer but my tea is ready.
Cheerio