- Thread starter
- #101
Ballbaby,
BC's '92's owned that age group with your terrific team winning at U16's and now the Dynamo winning at U18.
Good teams come from good competition!
Funny how the more things change the more they stay the same. Your rivalry with CMF Dynamo is/was as fierce as my little CMF Barca team has with your SGU team that just finished 4th at nationals. They knocked us out in the provincial semis after we took the league title. It should continue to get better as they get older.
Well done to Jim and the SGU boys.
Regs,
The investment that most big clubs now put in to their programs is huge. At the youth level (U14 and down) it can go from anywhere to 4-5 days a week. As they get older, training time decreases and that's where we slowly slide down the developmental path. While the rest of the world increases training time at this age, we do the opposite. The work you put in is the results you get out. It is starting to change...
BC's '92's owned that age group with your terrific team winning at U16's and now the Dynamo winning at U18.
Good teams come from good competition!
Funny how the more things change the more they stay the same. Your rivalry with CMF Dynamo is/was as fierce as my little CMF Barca team has with your SGU team that just finished 4th at nationals. They knocked us out in the provincial semis after we took the league title. It should continue to get better as they get older.
Well done to Jim and the SGU boys.
Regs,
The investment that most big clubs now put in to their programs is huge. At the youth level (U14 and down) it can go from anywhere to 4-5 days a week. As they get older, training time decreases and that's where we slowly slide down the developmental path. While the rest of the world increases training time at this age, we do the opposite. The work you put in is the results you get out. It is starting to change...