italian_stallion21
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #361
We were still in the game when the second half started because few of 'your' players could actually hit the net from 25 yards our or more . That's not a fluke on our part, simply piss-poor striking on 'your' part.
Apparently you need a reminder of how the match went, and I'm happy to provide it : We had the lead, and 'you' tied it with 10 min. until time on not a great, clean strike but a shot that our keeper admittedly should have had but let squeak under him. Not only that, we had more and better opportunities to score in the second half than you did in the first, so I'd say that if there was a fluke to be pointed to it was that the final scoreline didn't read at least 3-0 Rams . Well, granted the squeaker goal...3-1 Rams .
Oh, you were saying stal...? Can't wait for the response...
~Shaven
I was saying.......... I've already said it before, quality (and I mean like a 90% chance that it should go in) chances for both teams were equal, he had a ton of good opportunities in the first, you in the second. If we had even put one in during the first half and then you guys had come back to tie, we'd both be saying the opposite things. But alas, not the way the soccer gods wanted it. They want us to have some pressure from the Wolves so that we keep playing hard until our end of season finale for first. At least that's how I see it