View attachment 15809
It does not surprise me all the Pollyana posts. People are not ready to accept and acknowledge the harsh realities of our current soccer state of affairs.
It seems that you are regurgitating the propaganda of the Canadian soccer establishment that has led us to this disaster. I encourage you to review on the facts.
1) The Canadian soccer teams and players were nothing special or above their counterparts in the region. If they were good in 1986, then why they did so miserably in the 1990 qualification process where they were easily outplayed and dismissed by Guatemala in an preliminary round.
The 1986 is simply an historical aberration. Central America was in the middle of brutal civil wars. The best players were not in the National tams, and the ones that were sent to play where so underfunded that sometimes did not have even soccer balls or uniforms. Games would be cancelled or moved because of the war (i.e. played in empty stadiums). In addition, Mexico was not in the qualification process as they were hosts as we got an extra berth.
I do not know if you have actually seen those games, but Canada was playing literally kick and run and most of the goals that led to that qualification were lucky goals from corner kicks or free kicks. If you do not beleive me, look at these goals:
I will sum up the Canadian strategy of 1986 for the young boys of the TTP:
A) Get a corner kick or free kick and pray that one of our taller players gets a header.
B) Kick the ball as high as possible and as far as possible to the centre forward. He might control it and then blast into the net.
C) Put two banks of 8 defenders. Tackle the ball and then kick it forward.
D) Have a fit team that defends with 8, and then runs and kicks and runs and kicks the ball.
No real strategy or finesse. Yes, some of those guys might have played beside Pele, but they did not certainly brought back this style and vision back to the Canadian National Team.
The players of the 1986 were as limited and poor technically as the current one (perhaps even worst). They simply got really lucky on having Mexico hosting the World Cup, the Central America nations in wars, and then having two lucky corner kicks in (which by the way one of them was a foul that the linesman did not see).
As for the 1994 we almost made it; it is simply bullshit. There was another continental play-off to be played, and this one was always won by Commebol (i.e. Argentina or Uruguay or Brazil). Thus, do not kid yourself that we almost qualify in 1994.
Watch the games and goals of 1980 of Canada and you will see that they were not playing well.
I command you for taking youth teams out of the country. I might suggest that instead of taking them to England or Europe that you take them to Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, so you and the players do not get a distorted image. It is more realistic to play in Concacaf. That is the real competition for Canada. When teams are taken to Europe; they usually do not play the best players, or the opponents or coaches play at lower levels of effort.
The crude reality is that by U12 our boys are technically behind most players in CONCACAF and COMMEBOL. There is no point in hiding this reality.
The lag by U12 is not the fault of the National Team Program. It is the fault of the grassroot coaches, administrators and facilitators.
This is where the fixing needs to be done.
Yeah, it would be great to have a professional league, but MOST COUNTRIES that do not qualify also have professional leagues.
There is no need to have ex-professional players guiding the kids. This is like saying professional and top scientist should be teaching algebra and physics in elementary schools and high-schools. Successful soccer players make enough money during the careers and rarely teach the game or teach the game well.
In fact most of the best players in the world were not taught by profesional players in their early years. They learn the game on the streets, favelas, potrerors or you name it. Spaces where kids play they game with little adult supervision.
Let me put in a simply way for you to understand it. If a an ex-professional soccer player is teaching kids; then it means that he was not that really good because he did not get enough money to retire. It also means that a family is paying him to teach the kids to learn. The best players in the world come from the most humble circles because they are "hungry" to get better, so they can have a better living for themselves and their families. They did not have any money in the first place to hire a coach to teach them to play soccer.
This is one of the myths that I hear a lot. "I played pro" then I am qualified and are the best option to teach the game. Having received a salary to play for a few years, does not mean that a person understands how motor learning and cognitive process work. Yes, I grant that this might help some to understand the latter, bu it is the understanding of the process that leads to effective coaching and transmission of skills on to the young generations. If anything, ex-professionals make more damage than good when they try to directly transport the training process of adults into children and pre-adolescent children.
Benito did well for Canada. It is not bad to have foreign and more experienced coaches for the National Team.
I disagree that we need a coach born here.
We need coaches like Bora Milutinovic, LaVolpe, Bradley.
We need coaches who understand CONCACAF. Coaches who understand who to play in San Pedro, San Jose, the Azteca, the Mateo Flores, etc.
This is one of the main problems with our soccer community. We think that we are in Europe. We are not. Until we learn how Mexico and Central America and the Caribean plays, we will not beat them.
We have a lot to learn, but the main problem is that we refuse to accept that we have a lot to learn.
And your contribution to find the solution is????