Rangerforever
Well-Known Member
Surrey United back in the draw?
Holy shite.
Holy shite.
Aves said:ah yes toes...perhaps I should say if there is only one left after this weekend...unless of course SU get a reprieve a la canucks in the last few moments...
but then again that didn't do them much good now did it?
Can you imagine a better win than beating SU later on after such dramatic circumstances?..I shudder to think of such a thing.
amgettingalittleaheadofmyselfhere
5bigtoes said:Once upon a time there was a club named Surrey United.....they got a second chance....
pipes said:Now that has to be a special moment,
Slurrey u actually loses the match but yet gets to protest because of an uneligible player. Which turns out to be a misundestanding or miscommunication within the league. Now let's turn the table. Appreciate this for what it is and take your lumps like men and accept the fact that you were not the better team on this day and allow victoria to move forward. No way !! For the fact that you could not accept that you lost in the first place.
Most teams are aware that surrey U are a force to be reckoned with but it is results like this that will question their character. Enjoy your second chance!!Even if you lose again you may hopefully find a reason to move on!!
Pipes
Peg/oldboy forever
Give me a fcuking break Look in the mirror, it's all you've ever done on TTP...aves said:Spare us the holier than thou morality play
Regs said:Give me a fcuking break Look in the mirror, it's all you've ever done on TTP...
~Regs.
Aves said:Saw the 7-0 SU win over Norvan today and it could have been a few more...not in the same league.
I heard these guys won their league...I also heard that they couldn't play a few underage regulars which I'm sure was a factor today.
That about sums it up, when you are missing 4 out of 5 of your top goal scorers, it does make a difference. As a league we decided to allow "underage" players to get some of the better talent out there who no longer want to play metro, but not yet old enough for play in the other masters leagues that do not allow underage players. The smaller players pool here in North Van, and the North Vancouver Rec. Commission insisting we carry 75 percent North Vancouver players on our rosters also affected our decision.There is a price to pay for doing that, however, as was seen in the SU/Norvan game. It is my understanding that all those players will be 35 for next year, we can see then if it makes a difference.
lupoman
lupomannotwhiningjustexplaininglifeinthenscl
5bigtoes said:Happy too win, FCUKIN right!!! Did we play well? FCUK NO! Has any other team ever won when they have played poorly? YEP! (I think even the SCFF, SU et al can claim a couple of jammy victories) Should we carry on? better FCUKIN believe it! What does all this mean? Surrey United in the semi Finals next weekend and one more chance for redemption...
jordy said:Toes ,sounds like your ready to explode with excitement. ****, that we be a mess!!