Stranger said:Or maybe you could post some more great stats.
Gurps said:Anyways, back on topic.
The Blaze vs Richmond game should be a good one, Richmond always plays well in the Cup, and the Blaze are defending. Should be a good one.
Stranger said:OK Gurps...I have to agree, that will be an interesting result. Tough draw for both teams out of the gate.
You may have, however, signed your "top players" to the A team in order to better compete for the Imperial. But do you honestly believe any Div 1 team -- stacked with it's best Div 2 players, naturally -- would have a hope in hell of beating enough Premier teams to win it all?
Gurps said:The Blaze vs Richmond game should be a good one, Richmond always plays well in the Cup, and the Blaze are defending. Should be a good one.
TS said:WTF?! I was hoping for an easier draw! Hopefully we can make up for last year's semifinal loss. Don't know why they don't just seed the teams according to where they are in the standings and then just match up high and low. Instead, 2 teams that have a legitimate shot of winning the cup must meet in the second round.
TS
Captain Shamrock said:Unfortunately for you this year, your team is unable to have the option of playing in the Imperial Cup this year. Unlucky.
bonefish said:With 5 distinct groups in Div2, trying to figure out seeding and weighting would be difficult and highly subjective.
Six of One said:You know what that's like, eh Captain? Or did Bimini's spank you 5-1 back when they let Div.2 teams into the Imperial Cup? I can't remember now, which is strange because it doesn't seem that long ago...
CDK said:After talking to some Classic players... It looks like we'll barely be able to field a team for our Cup game. Only a 47(?) year old Peter Stipancic, a 35 year old, slightly overweight yet lovable, Danny Has and a blind as a bat keeper who can't see a 40 yard shot coming at him (are those Edgar Davids classes ready yet?) are going to be available with some other old over weight never beens.
We don't have chance.